http://www.facebook.com/pages/CFR-Mediation/271140287576
Although BP spoke of “appointing” a neutral mediator a week ago – there seems to no further mention of the planned mediation, much less how the plan will address the potential pitfalls to mediator involvement as designed by BP. Regardless of the appointee, it is paramount that the designated mediator be just that – a mediator, not an appeals levels claims adjuster.
For true mediation to occur the mediator must be a neutral person who is chosen by the parties – both parties. BP must create a program that supports this position not in name, but also program design. A mediator that works for one claimant, may not be the best mediator for another.
In addition, a person with a claim against BP is going to be hard pressed to experience any interaction with BP claims adjusters as one of equal power in the resolution. Mediation does not permit this power inequity. Mediation, even between individuals and BP, should be a focused conversation that addresses a plan for complete restitution – a plan that is deemed reasonable to both sides of the claim.
CFR is available to mediate claims against BP for damages related to the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, our focus remains on the promotion of efficient, effective, and fair resolution of issues.
See Also: Mediation Engaged to Respond to BP Oil Spill
Related Posts:
Tags: bp, bp mediator, bp oil spill, claims, corporate mediation, damages, equality, gulf, gulf of mexico, Gulf Spill, louisiana, Mediation, mediation program, mediator, neutral, oil spill, voluntary
